Trade Wars Stupidity

A Trade War supported by Lies

Trump claimed that in 2024, “China made $1 trillion off trade with the United States.” Donald Trump, April 11, 2025. Trump made this claim 5 times in the last week. It is false. There is a trade imbalance with China. China surplus is 263 billion dollars. It means that China sells a lot more goods and services to the US than we sell to China. This surplus was decreasing in 2023 and 2024.

Politifact Link

Economists have warned Trump that trade wars are a lose-lose game. The cost of tariffs are passed on to consumer, increasing the cost of products. In 2024, candidate Trump acted concerned about inflation. He blasted Biden for high inflation which peaked in 2022. He gave Biden no credit for bringing down inflation. Now, he doesn’t care. See article:

Commentary: Trump never cared about inflation

It is an excellent article. The tariffs cause stagflation, which is a combination of increasing prices and a slowing economy. His reaction is a quick fix, by lowering interest rates, which makes borrowing easier. He is now looking ways to fire Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, so he can install someone who will cut interest rates. The Federal Reserve is an independent branch of government.

Another lie is how much the US is gaining on the payment of tariffs. The U.S. is “taking in almost $2 billion a day in tariffs.” according to Trump. It’s way off base. Politifact rules this as false. The U.S. Treasury’s April 8 daily statement shows $192 million in revenues for custom duties and certain excise taxes.

Politifact link on tariff payments

More absurd false statements came from Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s Press Secretary, who stated that the tariffs should be viewed as a tax cut. Politifact judges this as false. See link below. I particularly like the quote from economist Tara Sinclair, who stated “Economists don’t agree on much, but we agree tariffs are taxes on consumers.” Yes, Trump is raising taxes. If you read Leavitt’s response to a journalist, you have to give her an A+ for creativity in presenting a rosy outlook, detached from present reality.

Politifact link on tariffs as tax cuts

Liberation Day (April 2) and Hitting the Pause Button (April 9)

April 2 was called Liberation Day by Trump as the trade war suddenly impacted approximately 150 countries with tariffs as high as 50%. Trump referred to them as “reciprocal tariffs” but they were not based on tariffs the countries imposed on US goods sold in their countries.

The reaction was immediate. Across April 3 and 4, U.S. stocks lost $6.6 trillion in value, their largest two-day loss in history by a margin of $2.2 trillion. On April 9, Trump paused all new tariffs for 90 days.

The situation since April 9 is very fluid. The reactions of world leaders were not like Trump described it, as leaders desperately trying to make deals with the US in a mad rush to avoid these tariffs. Instead, they consulted with their other trading partners. It is likely the multinational talks will continue. See Wikipedia link at end.

China and Japan’s Reactions

An extremely high tariff of 125% is currently levied against all of China’s exports. China responded with a tariff of 145% against US goods.

For his part, Chinese President Xi Jinping travelled to three Southeast Asian countries last week to bolster regional ties. He called on trading partners, including Vietnam, to oppose unilateral bullying. “There are no winners in trade wars and tariff wars,” Xi said in an article published in Vietnamese media, without mentioning the US.

Trump stated there has been great progress with Japan on tariffs. Japan’s response to tariffs on export of cars, was that it was “inconsistent” with the trade agreement of 2019 as negotiated in Trump’s first term. So, Trump agreed in 2019 not to levy tariffs on cars, then once he’s re-elected, he ignores his own trade agreement. See link below.

Trump’s auto tariffs spark concerns in Japan

A credibility gap has gotten larger. Trump and his economic advisors, continue their rosy outlook, while the trade relationships deteriorate coupled with a slowing economy and higher prices. The Dow Jones Average dropped about 1,000 points as investors looked elsewhere to invest their money.

How far will Trump go?

Trump is in trouble. Ir is not just his wealthy donors are losing money in the stock market. Many Americans are feeling the pain. My retirement account has definitely been hit hard. Tariffs will mean higher prices. Economists have shown it is the poorest Americans, who buy the most goods affected by tariffs.

“President Donald Trump has proven that tariffs work for the American people,” Mr. Navarro said in January. “It’s not going to be painful for America. It’s going to be a beautiful thing.”

Peter Navarro is the senior counselor for trade and manufacturing to U.S. president Donald Trump since January 2025. Mr. Navarro echoed Mr. Trump’s false claims that he won the 2020 election. And he defied the Congressional subpoena relating to the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, and was sentenced to jail. Upon his release, Mr. Navarro went directly to the campaign trail and campaigned for the president through Election Day.

So, how far will Trump go all depends on who has Trump’s ear at the time. It has been reported that his other economic advisors want to have a more focused approach to tariffs. But, Trump doesn’t back down easily, despite the push back.

The Wikipedia link provided below is an excellent review of the current tariffs and generally be kept up to date.

Stay tuned,

Dave

Wikipedia: Tariffs in the second Trump administration

NY Times, April 20, The Trade Adviser Who Hates Trade

I have included this link, but I am not sure if it can be opened by non-subscribers to NY Times. It is an excellent article on Peter Navarro.

Trade Wars – No winners

March 2 is getting way too close for comfort.  The stock market crashed yesterday as hopes dimmed on any negotiated settlement.  The two hard core hawks in Trump’s administration (Lighthizer and Navarro) are likely in control, working on the premise that once we exert enough economic pressure, China will cave in.

Trade wars are unlike real wars.  In this case, we know exactly how China will react on March 2 when tariffs go to 25%.  They will try to match us dollar for dollar. It will simultaneously  hurt both countries.   The slowing Chinese economy coupled with a general slowdown in Europe, will make for less demand for US goods abroad.

China can withstand a lot more pain than we can.  They know this and we know this.   Trump talks about doing what is right for our country, while Chinese leaders talk about global cooperation.   Wow, it used to be the other way around.   It is a mess, because we need China’s help in convincing North Korea to end their nuclear plans.

Republicans used to be for free trade, but by embracing Trump’s policies, they are really for isolation and protectionism.

Stay tuned.

Dave

Trump’s economic advisors

“It is a horrible deal, really horrible, but we’re going to fix that”

This is any particular quote from Trump but applicable to many accords – from NAFTA, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and to many bilateral accords, most recently his attack on he  South Korean Trade Agreement.   The same quote can be said of the Iran Nuclear deal and the Paris Accords on Climate Change Mitigation.   Everything is blamed on prior administrations, but most of the blame still goes to President Obama.

A minor case in point –  on January 12, 2018,  Trump cancelled a trip to the US embassy in London, citing Obama poor decision in moving the Embassy at a cost of 1.2 billion dollars.   It was decided upon by President Bush and not Obama.   Trump rarely lets facts get in his way.

Gary Cohen,  was the head of the National Economic Council,  and chief economic advisor to Trump.   He is generally accredited for Trump’s tax cut and jobs program, signed into law on December 22, 2017.   On March 6, 2018,  Gary Cohen resigned in March, just before the imposition of tariffs on aluminum and steel.  It was widely reported that he was against the tariffs.  Larry Kudlow has been appointed to this position.   Kudlow is a strong believer in  supply-side economics, which means that a cut in federal taxes, will stimulate the economy sufficiently to make up for the loss in tax revenue.  He been dead wrong a number of times, beginning with the opinion that tax increases would dampen the economy during the Clinton administration.  Just the reverse happened, and the economy boomed after this.

Kudlow was a strong advocate of George W. Bush’s substantial tax cuts, and argued that the tax cuts would lead to an economic boom of equal magnitude. After the implementation of the Bush tax cuts, Kudlow insisted year after year that the economy was in the middle of a “Bush boom”, and chastised other commentators for failing to realize it. Kudlow firmly denied that the United States would enter a recession in 2007, or that it was in the midst of a recession in early to mid-2008. In December 2007, he wrote: “The recession debate is over. It’s not gonna happen. Time to move on. At a bare minimum, we are looking at Goldilocks 2.0. (And that’s a minimum). The Bush boom is alive and well. It’s finishing up its sixth splendid year with many more years to come”. In a May 2008 column entitled “‘R’ is for ‘Right,'” Kudlow wrote: “President George W. Bush may turn out to be the top economic forecaster in the country”. By July 2008, Kudlow continued to deny that the economy was looking poor, insisting that “We are in a mental recession, not an actual recession.” Lehman Brothers collapsed in September 2008, creating a full-blown international banking crisis.

Larry Kudlow is well educated, articulate and  very straight forward.  He has been a regular commentator on MSNBC.  His comments is generally appreciated, as he is well informed.  However,  he has been frequently wrong on the basic moves of the economy, I believe because of his philosophical perspective of less government intervention.   This has been chronicled in a book entitled Superforecasting (2015).   The book explains how experts in various fields, do no better than amateurs.

Two key advisers right now, are Peter Navarro, Director of the National Trade Council  and Wilbur Ross,  Secretary of the Commerce Department.   In many administrations, these organizations and individuals might not receive much attention, as they engage in behind the scenes negotiations on trade and commerce.   However,  as fears of a trade war with China,  intensify and concerns of the impact on our economy is debated,  these two individuals are increasingly in the media, particularly in the business news reporting.

Peter Navarro is a very controversial figure at present.  Wikipedia labels him as a heterodox economist, with opinions  outside of the mainstream economistss.   He is also considered a protectionist and isolationist by Wikipedia.   According to the Guardian:

Navarro was a key architect of Trump’s “America First” policy of economic nationalism and a tireless critic of China’s economic policies – one of his books is decorated with a map of America being stabbed in the heart with a knife marked Made in China. Although he has agitated for aggressively protectionist trade policy since joining the Trump campaign in 2016, the tariffs are his first key victory. During the campaign, Navarro, the only economics PhD in the Trump team, described his role as merely a facilitator. “The president – he’s the man who leads,” he told the Wall Street Journal. “He says, ‘I want to do this. How do we do it?’ The way I help is figuring out how you might do it.”

Protectionism, or economic nationalism?  Perhaps the choice of words doesn’t matter; it is the outcomes in the long run that are important.   I’ve included links on Peter Navarro at the end of this blog.

Finally,  a key adviser to Donald Trump is  Wilbur Ross.   His view on trade, as per Wikipedia:

On the subject of foreign trade, Ross has said: “I am not anti-trade. I am pro-trade, but I’m pro-sensible trade. [Being anti-trade] is a disadvantage of the American worker and the American manufacturing community.” Ross has also said that the government “should provide access to our markets to those countries who play fair, play by the rules and give everybody a fair chance to compete. Those who do not should not get away with it – they should be punished.” Initially in favor of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Ross has said that after examining the agreement, he found it was “not consistent with what was advertised.”[34]

In 2004, The Economist described Ross’s views as protectionist. Germany’s chancellor Angela Merkel has also voiced concerns during 2018 World Economic Forum in Davos over Ross and the Trump administration views as “not the proper answer”.  Ross, at the 2018 World Economic Forum, responded to concerns by noting that “There have always been trade wars. The difference now is U.S. troops are now coming to the ramparts.”

Wilbur Ross has appeared on a number of business news stations, including MSNBC, and I happen to like his straight forward answers to questions.  He always seems to be well prepared, informed and polite.   He chooses his words well.    However, he seems to underplay the affect of the proposed tariffs  might have on the stock market.

How the Trump trade wars will finally be resolved, is difficult to say.   Republican biased news stations say that in the end,   the hard position taken  by Trump will result in China yielding, particularly on intellectual property rights.  Other commentators see only an escalation of tariffs, as China would rather fight than be seen as having given in to the US.   Economic nationalism works on both continents, sometimes escalation is easier than compromise.  Certainly, the sell off in the stock market is based on the potential for a protracted battle.

As I publish this blog, the Dow is poised to drop around 500 points.

I have included a number of links on Cohen, Kudlow, Navarro and Ross.   All individuals  have extensive biographies available on the Internet.

Stay tuned,

Dave

Links:

Wikipedia:Wilbur Ross

Wikipedia:  Peter Navarro 

Peter Navarro, the economist shaping Trump’s economic thinking

Wikipedia:  Larry Kudlow

New York Times:  Larry Kudlow is the new favorite to replace Gary Cohen

Wikipedia:  Gary Cohen