Politicians lie. They all do it. But they also get caught doing it. That’s the purpose of fact checking organizations. Trump supporters have a lot to explain, and their defense of Trump includes a lot that is just not true. I encourage my followers to fact check what they read here, and it really isn’t hard. Also, “main stream media” such as CNN and the print media, including the New York Times and Washington Post are very reliable sources of information. The House Intelligence Committee puts an incredible amount of raw information, i.e. transcripts of testimony and documents on their website. It is hard to keep up with all of this, but it is out there.
It is very consistent for Trump to launch a counter offensive attack on impeachment, by supporting and often retweeting statements by Republican senators, which are without foundation, when his actions are indefensible.
Here is a short list of statements which are absolute rubbish:
Question 1: Did President Barack Obama immediately fire all Bush-appointed ambassadors “the day he was elected office”?
As is the custom, Obama immediately replaced most — not all — of Bush’s politically appointed ambassadors. Obama did not remove any of the career appointees to ambassadorships.
Sources: Factcheck.org and politifact.com
Question arises because Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch was recalled after a smear campaign was launch against her by people close to Donald Trump, including Rudy Giuliani and Representative Pete Sessions. There is a lot more to this story, but Trump got caught before he could put a political appointee into the Ambassador position.
Question 2: Is it true that several news organizations reported that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election. Senator Kennedy states, “It’s been well documented in the Financial Times, in Politico, in The Economist, in the Washington Examiner, even on CBS, that the prime minister of Ukraine, the interior minister, the Ukrainian ambassador to the United States, the head of the Ukrainian Anti-Corruption League, all meddled in the election on social media and otherwise,”
A: From Politifact.com:
We found that these articles paint a picture of Ukrainian leaders fearful of Russia and of Trump’s comments that took a more conciliatory stance on Russian aggression. The news coverage shows Ukrainians preferred Hillary Clinton because she was tough on Russia. However, the articles don’t show a vast, top-down approach ordered to boost Clinton.
Kennedy mentioned The Economist multiple times. The Economist’s U.S. editor John Prideaux told us: “We are a bit puzzled by Sen. Kennedy citing us to the effect that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 elections.”
Republicans frequently mention a 2017 Politico article, which focused on the work of a Democratic political contractor who tried to dig up dirt on Trump and his advisers. We vetted it and found that the GOP has used its findings selectively.
Question 3: Is Sen. John Kennedy similar accusation true? The Senator says former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko “actively worked for Secretary Clinton.
Answer by Politifact.com – see link.
His sources are completely lacking. It didn’t get the “Pants on Fire” designation, but it should.
Question 4: What about the 2017 Politico story that shows the Sen. Kennedy statements are true?
A: “The article did not state that the Ukrainian government conspired with the Clinton campaign or the DNC,” said Melissa Cooke, a booking manager for Politico, in an email. “It also emphasized that the acts of Ukrainian officials to raise questions about Trump were not comparable to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, and reported that the then-Ukrainian government was trying to make amends with then-President-elect Trump.”
Senator John Kennedy is a Republican from Louisiana.
Question 5: Is Trump’s statement true: “They never thought, Dan, that I was going to release that call, and I really had no choice because Adam Schiff made up a call,” Trump said Nov. 15. “He said the president said this, and then he made up a call.”
Trump has repeated this statement numerous times. Schiff already had the released memo, and was just giving a “dramatized synopsis” of key points. See link.
I’m stopping at 5 false statements for now. For more false statements, please follow this link to politifact.org (Fact-checking Impeachment Claims) . One of the few true claims came surprisingly from Fox News, and their legal analyst who stated it is perfectly legal to have witnesses testify in private. I’ve included this link at the end.
There will be an enormous number of false statements, coming from Rep. Jim Jordan, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Attorney diGenova and his wife, Victoria Toensing (see link below), Sen. John Kennedy from Louisiana, and of course, Donald Trump. I encourage everyone to check out these links and dig in more to get the truth. It doesn’t come from Facebook or Twitter, that’s for sure.
In the coming few weeks, the false statements will increase. Republicans know when the impeachment goes to the Senate, they have the votes to acquit Trump. It is highly likely they will not only acquit him, but cast the Democrats as the true villains, is concocting false evidence against Trump, because they can’t deal with their loss in 2016 or because they can’t win the election
Sen. Kennedy claims that Ukrainian President Poroshenko actively worked for Clinton is False
What we know about the Politico story at the heart of a Ukraine conspiracy theory
Did Obama Fire All Bush-Appointed Ambassadors?
Donald Trump gets Ukraine phone memo timeline backwards
Exclusive: Giuliani Ally Pete Sessions Was Eyed for Top Slot in Ukraine
Fox News analyst correct: Impeachment inquiry is following rules by questioning witnesses in private
Other Fact checking resources:
AP FACT CHECK: Trump and the people he forgets he knew
Republicans Cherry-Pick Facts on Impeachment