There is plenty of commentary on the Big, Beautiful Bill, or the Big Bad Bill. Or Big Horrible Bill. Quick summary: Many Senate Republicans favor it, because it advances Trump’s agenda. Democrats will vote against it, for the same reason. We will simply refer to it as BBB.
There are millions of Americans who are more focused whether Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs will be found guilty of sex trafficking or the Bezos-Sanchez dream wedding in Venice. I don’t blame them. I haven’t followed either story, but here’s my take anyway. Combs is very guilty. On the wedding thing, Forbes recently posted that they think it costs around 25 million dollars. It was held on the island of San Giorgio Maggiore. Whether they were already married is open for debate.
Back to our real story. What has emerged as a weird sticking point is raising the debt ceiling by another 4 to 5 trillion dollars. The House version says 4 trillion, and the Senate version say 5 trillion. I call it weird, because Elizabeth Warren, the ardent Democrat, who clearly would call it the Big Horrible Bill, would eliminate the debt ceiling entirely. So, would Trump and on this point, they are both right!
Here’s Warren’s exact words:
“It is possible that hell has frozen over. President Trump and I agree on something very important: Abolish the debt limit. The debt limit is a political tool that allows the minority party to threaten economic collapse, forcing Congress to negotiate its demands. It serves no other function. None. It has no impact on spending, and it doesn’t restrain the growth of the national debt.
“I’ve pushed publicly and privately, whether Democrats or Republicans have been in charge, to scrap the debt ceiling permanently. Now, with Mr. Trump’s support, our country could finally get rid of this form of brinkmanship that has, for decades, threatened the stability of our economy.
The debt limit caps the amount of money the U.S. government can borrow. If the government hits the limit before Congress authorizes an increase, the U.S. would default on its debt. That means not making interest payments on U.S. bonds, not paying our military or halting Social Security checks. Chaos in the financial markets could cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs, while the cost of home mortgages and car loans would skyrocket. In short, we would create a self-inflicted financial crisis.”
It is very weird, as both Elon Musk and Rand Paul, make this a real sticking point for passage. Musk obviously in not a Senator, but he has made it his mission to see that the BBB is defeated by blasting away on Twitter. I’m saying this is weird, because both Musk and Paul are using the popular misconception of what the debt ceiling is, to support their views.
It is getting really nasty on social media as Musk described the BBB as follows:
“pork-filled spending bill that will massively increase the budget deficit and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.”
Trump is parting ways with traditional Republicans, who reasoned that the best way for our economy to grow, was with less government intervention. Now, Trump promotes tariffs, which can artificially raise the price of US products to benefit manufacturers and hurt consumers, until the day when they are gone.
He would like to sack the head of the Federal Reserve, so he can cut rates, further fueling inflation, perhaps not immediately, but he would leave a terrible mess for the next administration. This is absolutely the worse government interference imaginable as it allows a president to play politics with interest rates. All to achieve very short term gain.
The national deficit and economic growth not the debt ceiling is what we should be worried about, and these will be impacted by the BBB and tariffs. Warren, Trump and others (like myself) want the debt ceiling gone, but simply raising it to 5 trillion dollars, will keep it from being a political bargaining chip in the short term.
I find it also bizarre that both Musk and Paul would make claims about raising the debt ceiling, completely contrary to statements from the US Treasury, under both Democratic and Republican presidents. But, at least with Senator Rand Paul, he’s had years of practice.
Don’t raise it, scrap it for the benefit of the current and future presidents.
Stay tuned,
Dave
Sen Warren: New York Times Opinion
