He has attacked FBI Director Comey as a leaker of classified information, the acting Director as Andrew McCabe as corrupt, the head of the Justice Department, Jeff Sessions and Rob Rosenstein of using poor judgment in the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. His latest attacks have been against Robert Mueller, accusing him of a unwarranted investigation of the Russian meddling in the 2016 and ignoring the crimes of Hillary Clinton in dealing with the Russians.
Although the harshest attacks come from Trump himself on the actions of the Justice Department, in other areas, Trump is touting the accomplishments of the Justice Department, particularly the war on drugs, and crack down on human trafficking and illegal immigration, without any mention of Jeff Sessions.
The head of the Justice Department and FBI can be fired at a moments notice without cause. Director Jim Comey learned he had been fired from CNN news broadcast. Andrew McCabe is no longer in the direct line of fire. The new FBI Director, Christopher Wray began his job yesterday. If he feels that Hillary Clinton broke the law during 2016, he is free to investigate this activity. Investigations can be closed, then re-opened.
I did not include attacks on the Washington Post and the New York Times from their reporting. I previously posted my reasons why the New York Times reporting should be trusted, and that the newspaper is thriving, not failing.
The most serious accusations are against Robert Mueller, because Trump will use this as a pretext to remove him. Jeff Sessions is far from being weak. Here’s the headline from the front page of the New York Times, “Under Attack, Justice Dept. Pushes Ahead, Quietly Carrying Out Trump’s Agenda.” It goes on how Jeff Sessions is at work by 6:15 am, and starts his day on a treadmill, and a bowl of instant oatmeal in the microwave. He hand-washes the bowl.
So, what were the malicious lie told by Trump? It is the uranium story. All fact checkers I know (Snopes.com, Politifact.com and factcheck.org find the essential details in Trump’s narrative are false. Here it is (snopes.com):
Allegations of a “quid pro quo” deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.
No US uranium can be exported to Russia, not before the deal and not afterwards. Russia may have an interest in US uranium mines, but Russia doesn’t get any uranium from the US. The “quid pro quo” is simply a polite way of saying that Russia bought Hillary’s support, by slipping 145 million to the Clinton Foundation. The whole story falls apart because the bulk of the contributions were made in 2007, long before the buyout of Uranium One.
The whole uranium story should have fallen apart long ago because the timeline is all wrong. The Snopes article states:
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
Nobody is above the law. Hillary Clinton, her staff and the Clinton Foundation must play by the rules. I particularly like the way Snopes concluded the piece:
An enormous volume of interest and speculation surrounds the workings of the Clinton Foundation, which is to be expected. Given the enormous sums of money it controls and the fact that it is run by a former U.S. president who is married to a possible future U.S. president, the foundation deserves all the scrutiny it gets, and more.
At the same time, for the sake of accuracy it’s crucial to differentiate between partisan accusations and what we actually know about it — however little that may be.
This was published in October 2016, as Trump was storming the country with “Crooked Hillary” narratives. Now the attacks have turned to Robert Mueller, as enemy number one. He is directed to investigate Russian interference into the 2016 election, so he really can’t extend his investigation to a contribution received in 2007 by Guistra to the Clinton Foundation as payoff for a decision after he no longer had a stake in the company. Whole narrative is really flaky.
I was very glad that no pardon was given to Hillary Clinton nor anyone in the White House or Clinton’s foundation before Obama’s departure.
Trump is trashing everyone who isn’t in the White House. At least, isn’t currently in the White House. The heat is definitely on as Robert Mueller has convened a grand jury to examine criminal activities associated with Russian interference in the 2016 elections.
The latest Quinnipiac Polls show that most Americans do not trust Trump. I wonder why?
Fact check: West Virginia Rally (much more fiction than fact
Snopes.com Russian to Judgment
(note the Brietbart connection, with Clinton Cash book in 2015)
West Virginia Rally- Trump: Politifact.com West Virginia Rally
The special counsel “should be looking at the … uranium (Hillary Clinton) sold that’s now in the hands of very angry Russians.”
Politifact on Uranium story
New York Times, 2015 article on the buyout transaction.